News

Restaurateur pays a high price for playing unlicensed music

(06 November 2007 07:00)
Performing Right Society logo

A restaurateur has paid a heavy price for failing to take out a music licence for his premises.

Hakim Mallem, who runs La Notte restaurant in Orpington, was told yesterday in the High Court by Mr Justice Norris that he had been “cocking a snook at the court”.

The accusation came after Mallem ignored an earlier court order to stop playing unlicensed music in his restaurant.

Mallem had been facing a jail sentence as a result and only avoided one after he agreed to pay £1,025 for a backdated licence to play background music.

However, Mallem has been left facing massive legal costs of more than £25,000 to cover fees run up by the Performing Right Society (PRS) in taking him to court.

Article continues below

A spokesperson for not-for-profit PRS said: “Whenever you play a sound recording in public, there are two separate licence fees to be paid. PRS distributes its licence fees to composers and music publishers and Phonographic Performance collects a separate licence fee which they distribute to record companies, recording artists and musicians.”

“A licence is required for any event except a family or domestic gathering, such as a wedding reception or birthday party.”

In March Mallem was banned from playing music at the restaurant or any other premises he runs after being caught by a PRS inspector playing music without a licence.


Frequently asked questions about music fees >>

PRS writ hits wrong note >>

Licensing reform boosting live music in pubs a year on >>

Don't let music replace a good atmosphere >>


By a court reporter

E-mail your comments to Chris Druce here.

 

The Caterer Blog
Catch up with more news and gossip on the Caterer Blog here
Newswire
For the latest hospitality news, sign up for our e-mail news alerts.

Source: CatererSearch

Spread the word:   related bookmark it! diggit! reddit!

SPONSORED LINKS

 
5th December 2008