Tags:

Fat Duck diners seek legal damages over norovirus outbreak

Kerstin  Kühn
Monday 21 September 2009 14:57
Heston Blumenthal: facing compensation claims from disgruntled diners

Victims of the food poisoning outbreak at Heston Blumenthal’s three-Michelin-starred Fat Duck restaurant are seeking legal damages from the chef.

Blumenthal closed the iconic restaurant in Bray, Berkshire, for two weeks in February and March after more than 500 diners were struck down by norovirus, or winter vomiting bug.

The Health Protection Agency (HPA) released a report on its investigation into the outbreak earlier this month stating the official cause was contaminated shellfish.

The report pointed to “several weaknesses in procedures” at the Fat Duck including delayed response to the incident and staff working when they should have been off sick.

The victims are now seeking damages against Blumenthal over the chef’s ‘pathetic response’ to the episode, according to the Daily Mail
 
Solicitors Hill Dickson are acting for boxing promoter Frank Warren and a number of other high-profile figures while TV presenter Jim Rosenthal has hired another legal firm to pursue his claim.

However, a spokeswoman for the Fat Duck defended the restaurant, saying it was still in the process of reviewing the HPA’s report.

“Unfortunately, until our insurers and legal teams have completed this review we are unable to comment further and we have written to all of our guests who were affected to advise them of this,” she said.

The HPA’s investigation focused on laboratory testing of diners with symptoms of diarrhoea and vomiting; and on illness among staff; as well as the examination of the restaurant environment and food processing, handling and supply; and laboratory testing of food samples.

Peter Todd, solicitor and partner at Hodge Jones & Allen LLP, told Caterer that, even if unable to prove negligence on behalf of the Fat Duck, the victims could sue the restaurant under the Consumer Protection Act.

“The Act is designed to help safeguard the consumer from products that do not reach a reasonable level of safety and restaurant food would be considered a product in this sense,” Todd said.

“The norovirus is considered a minor form of food poisoning and general damages range from £600 to £2500 depending on the degree of illness. The restaurant’s insurers could head off claims by making an offer of compensation to everyone affected.”


Contaminated shellfish caused food scare at Michelin-starred Fat Duck >>

Norovirus may have closed Fat Duck, says Blumenthal >> 

Heston Blumenthal gets go ahead to reopen the Fat Duck >>
 
The Fat Duck: Business as usual after recent food scare? >>


By Kerstin Kühn


E-mail your comments to Kerstin Kühn here.

If you have something to say on this story or anything else join the debate at Table Talk - Caterer's new networking forum. Go to www.caterersearch.com/tabletalk


Caterersearch.com jobs

Looking for a new job? Find your next restaurant job here with Caterersearch.com jobs


 

Blogs on Caterersearch.com
Catch up with more news and gossip on all Caterer's blogs
Newsletters
For the latest hospitality news, sign up for our e-mail newsletters.

Recommended articles

Articles from the web

 
Profiting from 2012: Case Studies

Latest Video

Foraging – why all the attention?

Using foraged ingredients is nothing new but the trend has become more mainstream over the past two years. However, the wider use of foraged food in restaurants also carries a certain amount of danger.

Watch here

Best of chef

Best of Chef – now available online

Best of Chef – now available online
View it now

Videos

Video: Foraging – why all the attention? Video: Bordeaux Revisited with Ronan Sayburn Claire John Campbell
Foraging:
why all the attention?
Watch the video here
Bordeaux Revisited
with Ronan Sayburn
Watch the video here
Claire Clark
masterclass
Watch the video here
Interview with John Campbell
at Coworth Park
Watch the video here